Aggregated networks
Many networks. One vetted feed.
Good offers are scattered across a dozen networks. affiliate.love pulls them into one marketplace and holds them to one standard. You compare terms in one view. No spreadsheet. No twelve logins.
Why aggregate at all
Three things change when the feed is one.
Aggregation is not a longer list. It is the same list, made readable. Here is what that buys you day to day.
-
One place to look
Offers from many networks land in a single list. You stop hopping between logins to compare the same vertical.
Browse the live feed -
Terms written the same way
Every source describes payouts its own way. We rewrite them into one shape, so CPA next to CPA means the same thing.
See the payout models -
One vetting bar
An offer keeps its source, but not its rules. Ours apply on top. A campaign we cannot verify never reaches the feed.
Read the compliance rules
Normalising the terms
Four fields we rewrite on every offer.
Networks describe the same deal in different words. That is the real cost of shopping around. We map each field once, so a comparison is honest.
| Field | As the network sends it | As you read it here |
|---|---|---|
| Payout model | Named per network: CPA, CPS, PPS, rev-share | Mapped to CPA, CPL or RevShare |
| Converting action | Buried in a PDF brief or a note field | One plain line stating what pays |
| Hold period | Often missing until you ask | Stated on the card before you apply |
| Traffic rules | Free text, sometimes contradictory | A checklist of allowed and banned sources |
Want the same view by vertical? Start from the offer category index.
From source to shelf
A campaign passes four gates before you see it.
We list fewer offers than the networks we draw from. That is the point. An offer that fails any gate stays out of the feed.
See how approval works-
Source review
We look at the network behind the offer first. Who runs it, how it pays, how it handles disputes.
-
Offer vetting
Then the campaign itself. Claims in the creative are checked against the advertiser's own terms.
-
Field mapping
Terms are rewritten into our shape. Duplicates of the same offer are merged into one card.
-
Tracking test
We fire a test click and wait for the postback. A postback is the server message that reports a sale.
What stays the same
Many sources, one account.
The sources vary. Your workflow does not. These four things hold for every offer in the feed, whichever network it came from.
- Source shown
- Each card names the network the offer came from.
- One login
- You apply once. Approvals carry across every source.
- One link format
- Tracking links are built the same way for all offers.
- One balance
- Earnings from every source roll into a single payout.
Link building is covered on tracking links. Payment terms sit on the publisher payouts page.
Common questions
Four questions publishers ask about sources.
Do I need an account with each network?
No. You apply to affiliate.love once. We hold the relationship with the source network. Your approvals and your balance stay with us.
Will I see the same offer twice?
We merge duplicates. When two sources carry one advertiser, the feed keeps a single card. The terms shown are the ones you will actually be paid on.
Who handles a tracking dispute?
We do. Send the campaign and the date. We check the postback log with the source and the advertiser, then report back with a reason.
Can an offer leave the feed?
Yes. Terms change and some campaigns stop passing review. Live offers show their status, so you can see a pause before you spend on it.
More answers live in the publisher FAQ.
One feed. One standard. One payout run.
Apply once and the whole marketplace opens up. A person reads every application. Questions about a source? Write to [email protected].